14 - Adverbial clauses

Mini exercise

  1. When I fall in love, it will be forever (sung by Nat King Cole)

  2. Wherever I lay my hat, that’s my home (sung by Marvin Gaye)

  3. Whenever/wherever we’re meant to be together, I’ll be there and you’ll be near (sung by Shakira)

These all contain examples of ADVERBIAL CLAUSES (underlined)

Clauses

Definitions

A clause is a linguistic unit (phrase) which describes a situation. It must have a Verb (to describe the situation), and it must have at least one Argument (the entity involved in the situation). If there is only one argument, this will come in subject position.

Typically the verb will carry tense.

For the purposes of this course, a “clause” is indistinguishable from a “sentence”, e.g.

  1. Jack likes cheese
  2. Anita is the coolest person in the universe!

Both of these can be described as sentences or clauses.

Unusual types of clauses

There are unusual types of clause which depart from the above definition. Some clauses can contain an implicit argument and a non-finite verb, e.g.

  1. (My) Being rich is not my primary aim in life
  2. To be rich is not my primary aim in life
  3. He told me to be quiet

However, we are not going to be focusing on these types of clauses in the course.

What is the purpose of clauses?

Clauses describe SITUATIONS which correspond to SCENES or MENTAL PICTURES. These scenes/mental pictures are essential to the way we think, express our thoughts, and categorise the world around us. (Nelson, K. (1999). Event representations, narrative development and internal working models. Attachment & Human Development, 1(3), 239–252.). Without clauses we wouldn’t really be able to communicate.

So why not just use the term “sentence”

We tend to use the term “Clause” as opposed to a “sentence” when there are multiple situations per sentence.

Dependent/subordinate versus main clauses

We distinguish between the main (or matrix) clause, and the dependent (or subordinate) clause, e.g.

  1. When I fall in love (SUB.), it will be forever (MAIN)

  2. Wherever I lay my hat (SUB.), that’s my home (MAIN)

  3. Whenever/wherever we’re meant to be together (SUB), I’ll be there and you’ll be near (MAIN)

In the above examples, the dependent clause is (a) semantically backgrounded and (b) syntactically optional (the sentence sounds okay without it). However, the sentence would sound very odd without the main clause.

To test whether a clause is dependent, you might wish to try the “door test”. Imagine someone pops their head round the door, and says a clause. If that clause is the main clause, it will probably sound okay in isolation. (I wish to acknowledge former student Steve McCafferty for this test!)

Exercise

For the following sentences, identify the dependent and main clauses. Try to use the following tests

  1. Are they syntactically optional (if yes, they are likely to be a dependent clause)

  2. Are they movable (if yes, they are likely to be a dependent clause)

  3. Are they semantically backgrounded? (if yes, the are likely to be a dependent clause)

  4. Do they pass the “door” test (if no, they are likely to be a subordinate clause)

  1. You can’t come to the party unless you bring strawberries and champagne
  2. You can bring books into the exam as long as they are placed on your desks.
  3. While Nancy likes hot food, her partner cannot stand chilli pepper.
  4. Nancy stood on tiptoe so that she could reach the top shelf
  5. Because it had been raining so heavily the fields were all underwater.
  6. When she was challenged about the stolen cake Dawn burst into tears.

Adverbial clauses

All of the dependent clauses in the above examples are “Adverbial Clauses”. This is because the clause (including the “linking” words, e.g. unless, as long as, while, so that, because) fufils the function of an Adverbial. They are

  1. Optional (like an adverbial)
  2. Movable (like an adverbial)
  3. Modify the event in the main clause (like an adverbial)

Have a look at the following examples:

  1. Prepositional Phrase acting as an Adverbial
  1. (Because of the rain) the fields were under water: phrase is OPTIONAL
  2. The fields were underwater [ because of the rain ] : phrase is MOVABLE

It also “modifies” the event in that it describes a reason for being underwater

  1. Clause acting as an Adverbial
  1. (Because it had been raining heavily) the fields were under water: clause is OPTIONAL
  2. The fields were underwater [ because it had been raining heavily ]: clause is MOVABLE

It also “modifies” the event in that it describes the reason for being underwater

Subordinating conjunctions

What is a subordinating conjunction?

Adverbial clauses are headed by linking words known as subordinating conjunctions, or subordinators, e.g. unless, as long as, while, so that, because. They express a variety of different meanings including (a) Logical Conditions (e.g. if, unless, provided that, as long as), (b) Temporal Situations (e.g. while, when, whenever), (c) Cause and Effect (e.g. because, since, so that), Contradiction (e.g. although) and Contrast (e.g. while, whereas).

Subordinating conjunctions come before the clause, and the phrase which contains both the conjunction and the clause is described as the Adverbial Phrase:

  1. [ Because [ it had been raining… (ADVERBIAL) CLAUSE  ] ADVERBIAL PHRASE ]

Subordinating conjunctions are like little pick-up trucks! When we add a subordinating conjunction to a sentence it becomes movable, e.g.

  1. He had a good time at the party. He was tired.
  2. He had a good time at the party, although he was tired.
  3. Although he was tired, he had a good time at the party.

Subordinating conjunctions and other linking words

Subordinating conjunctions have similar meanings to other linking words:

  1. Although he was tired, he had a good time at the party. SUBORDINATING CONJUNCTION - acts like a pickup truck and makes the clause movable.
  2. He was tired, but he had a good time at the party. COORDINATING CONJUNCTION - can only come between clauses.
  3. He was tired. However, he had a good time at the party. ADVERB - can only come between sentences (note the full stop!)

The importance of subordinating conjunctions

Subordinating conjunctions are very useful devices for linking events in a narrative.

They are assessed in many language assessments, e.g. the Formulating Sentences subtest of the CELF.

Language impaired individuals have great difficulties using subordinating conjunctions to introduce adverbial clauses. They have lower clausal density (number of clauses per sentence)

Exercise

For the following sentences:

  1. Link them using a subordinating conjunction.

  2. Do tests for the adverbial phrase (the movement test and “door” test)

  3. Try to rewrite the sentence using either an Adverbial or a coordinating conjunction (not always possible)

  1. Touch that wire. You will be electrocuted.
  2. Jack did not study very hard. He failed the exam.
  3. Max can come to the party. He promises to behave himself.
  4. Janice and Elena were on holiday. Their house was being burgled.
  5. Jack added salt and pepper. The food tasted better.

Clinical applications

Complex sentences are easier for children to understand / produce when their order is ‘iconic’ (de Ruiter, 2018). This means that the order of mention is the same as the order of occurrence, e.g.

  1. ICONIC: Because the bus was late she missed the lecture
  2. NON-ICONIC: She missed the lecture because the bus was late

Note that whether the order is iconic or not will depend on the conjunction. If you use ‘so’, then to make the order iconic, the conjunction will come in the middle.

  1. ICONIC: The bus was late so she missed the lecture.

Therapists can manipulate iconicity in their intervention, e.g. give the most simple order first?

One way to teach children how conjunctions work is to use techniques such as ‘Shape-coding’ (Ebbels). This uses shapes and colours to show sentence structure. This technique can be used to show the two different orders of sentences containing subordinating conjunctions.

de Ruiter, L. E., Theakston, A. L., Brandt, S., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2018). Iconicity affects children’s comprehension of complex sentences: The role of semantics, clause order, input and individual differences. Cognition, 171, 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.10.015